Dictionary
the philosophical study of being and knowing
|
Wikipedia
Metaphysics (Greek language Greek words ''meta'' = after/beyond and ''physics'' = nature) is a branch of philosophy concerned with the study of "first principles" and "being" (ontology). Problems that were not originally considered metaphysical have been added to metaphysics. Other problems that were considered metaphysical problems for centuries are now typically relegated to their own separate subheadings in philosophy, such as philosophy of religion, philosophy of mind, philosophy of perception, philosophy of language, and philosophy of science. In rare cases subjects of metaphysical research have been found to be entirely physical and natural, thus making them part of physics. What might be called the ''core'' metaphysical problems would be the ones which have ''always'' been considered metaphysical. What most of such problems have in common is that they are the problems of ''ontology,'' "the science of being ''wikt:quaqua'' being".Other philosophical traditions have very different conceptions—such as "what came first, the chicken or the egg?" problems—from those in the Western philosophical tradition; for example, Taoism and indeed, much of Eastern philosophy completely reject many of the most basic tenets of Aristotelian metaphysics, principles which have by now become almost completely internalized and beyond question in Western philosophy, though a number of dissidents from Aristotelian metaphysics have emerged in the west, such as Georg Wilhelm Friedrich HegelHegel's ''Science of Logic''.In modern times, the meaning of the word ''metaphysics'' has become confused by popular significations that are really unrelated to metaphysics or ontology ''per se'', viz. esotericism and occultoccultism. Esotericism and occultism, in their many forms, are not so much concerned with inquiries into first principles or the nature of being, though they do tend to proceed on the metaphysical assumption that all being is "one".
The origin of the word 'metaphysics' - The ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle produced a number of works which together were called the ''Physics''. In an early edition, the works of Aristotle were organized in such a way that another set of works was placed right after the ''Physics.'' These books seemed to concern a basic, fundamental area of philosophical inquiry, which at the time did not have a name; Aristotle himself just called it "first philosophy". So early Aristotelian scholars called those books τὰ μετὰ τὰ !φυσικ ά? !βιβλι α,? "ta meta ta physika biblia", which means "the books that come after the (books about) physics." That is one theory of the origin of the word 'metaphysics' (in Greek languageGreek, !μεταφ υσικά ).? An older theory maintains that Aristotle intended to sharply distinguish Metaphysics from Physics. While Physics studies the laws of matter, gravity and atoms, Metaphysics will study that realm that is not part of that physics, for example, ethics, aesthetics and the phenomena of inner life. This older theory continues to have some advocates.Either way, etymologyetymologically speaking, metaphysics is the subject of those books by Aristotle which were called, collectively, the ''Metaphysics''. According to one theory, it was so named because it came after the book of Physics. But the actual subject matter in the book, are on the topic of things that underlie the !physical—"beyond&qu ot;? the physical, so to speak—therefore fitting the word in two ways.The ''Metaphysics'' was divided into three parts, now regarded as the traditional branches of Western metaphysics, called (1) ontology, (2) theology, and (3) universal science. There were also some smaller, perhaps tangential matters: a philosophical lexicon, an attempt to define philosophy in general, and several extracts from the ''Physics'' repeated verbatim. ''Ontology'' is the study of existence; it has been traditionally defined as 'the science of being ''qua'' being'. ''Theology'' means, here, the study of God or the deitygods and of questions about the divine. ''Universal science'' is supposed to be the study of so-called Aristotelian first principlesfirst principles, which underlie all other inquiries; an example of such a principle is the law of non-contradiction: A = A, A not = B, Not both A and B. In other words, the elementary laws of logic as Aristotle knew them. Universal science or first philosophy treats of "being ''qua'' being" — that is, what is basic to all science before one adds the particular details of any one science. This includes topic like causality, substance, species, and elements. It also includes topics like relationship, interaction, finitude and a theoretically boundless infinity.
Examples - It is sometimes difficult to understand what the issues even ''are'' in metaphysics. It might help to begin with a fairly simple example that will help to introduce the problems of metaphysics.Imagine now that we are in a room, and in the middle of the room there is a table, and in the middle of the table there is a big, fresh, juicy, red apple. We can ask many ''metaphysical'' questions about this apple. This will, hopefully, help us understand better what metaphysics is.The apple is an excellent example of a physical object: one can pick it up, throw it around, eat it, and so on. It occupies spacetimespace and time and has a variety of Property (philosophy)properties. Suppose we ask: ''what'' ''are'' physical objects? This might seem like the sort of question to which one ''cannot'' give an answer ("What is, what is?"). What could one possibly use to explain what physical objects are? But philosophers actually do try to give some general sorts of accounts of what they are. They ask: Are physical objects just bundles of their properties? Or are they substances which ''have'' those properties? That is called the ''problem of substance'' or ''objecthood''.Here is another sort of question. We said that the apple has ''properties'', like being red, being big, being juicy. How are properties different from objects? Notice, we say that things like apples have properties like redness. But apples and redness are different sorts of items, of things, of entities. One can pick up and touch an apple, but cannot pick up and touch redness, except perhaps in the sense that you can pick up and touch red ''things.'' So how can we best think about what properties ''are''? This is one of the central questions in what is known as the ''problem of universals''.Here is another question about what physical objects are: when ''in'' ''general'' can we say that physical objects ''come'' ''into'' ''being'' and when they ''cease'' ''to'' ''exist''? Surely the apple can ''change'' in many ways without ceasing to exist. It could get brown and rotten but it would still be that apple. But if someone ate it, it would not just have changed; it would no longer exist. So there are some metaphysical questions to be answered about the notions of identity, or being the same thing over time, and change. (See Also: identity and change)This apple exists in space (it sits on a table in a room) and in time (it was not on the table a week ago and it will not be on the table a week from now). But what does this talk of space and time mean? Can we say, for example, that space is like an invisible three-dimensional grid in which the apple is located? Suppose the apple, and every other physical object in the universe, were to be entirely removed from existence: then would space, that "invisible grid," still exist? Some people say not—they say that without physical objects, space would not exist, because space is the framework in which we understand how physical objects are related to each other. There are many other metaphysical questions to ask about space and time.There are some other very different sorts of problems in metaphysics. The apple is one sort of thing; now if Sally is in the room, and we say Sally has a mind, we are surely going to say that Sally's mind is a different sort of thing from the apple (if it is a sort of ''thing'' at all). I might say that my mind is immaterial, but the apple is a material object, (although there is much disagreement amongst philosophers about the metaphysical status of minds). Moreover, it sounds a little strange to say that Sally's mind is located in any ''particular'' ''place''; maybe we could say it is somewhere in the room; but the apple is obviously located in a particular place, namely on the middle of the table. It ''seems'' clear that minds are fundamentally different from physical bodybodies. But if so, how can something mental, like a decision to eat, cause a physical event to occur, like biting down on the apple? How are the mind and body Causalitycausally interconnected if they are two totally different sorts of things? This is called the ''mind-body problem'', which is now typically relegated to a philosophical subdiscipline called ''philosophy of mind.'' The mind-body problem is sometimes still considered part of metaphysics, however. Perhaps the most profound problem belonging to this branch is the question of consciousness. No discipline has been able to explain what consciousness is or how it works.
Criticism - Metaphysics has been attacked, at different times in history, as being futile and overly vague. Lord Byron often mocked the subject in his works. David Hume and Immanuel Kant both prescribed a limited role to the subject and argued against knowledge progressing beyond the world of our representations (except, in the case of Kant, to knowledge that the ''Noumenonnoumena'' exist). AyerA.J. Ayer is famous for leading a "revolt against metaphysics", where he claimed that its propositions were meaningless. Martin Heidegger often criticised metaphysics, yet he dealt with questions that many would consider to be metaphysical. British universities became less concerned with the area for much of the 20th century, but it has revived itself in recent times, amongst philosophy departments.A more nuanced view is that metaphysical statements are not ''meaningless'' statements, but rather that they are generally not ''fallible'', ''testable'' or ''provable'' statements. That is to say, there is no valid set of empirical observations nor a valid set of logical arguments which could ''definitively'' prove metaphysical statements to be true or false. Hence, a metaphysical statement usually implies a ''belief'' about the world or about the universe which may seem reasonable but is ultimately not provable. That belief could be changed in a ''non-arbitrary'' way, based on experience or argument, yet there exists no evidence or argument so compelling that it could rationally ''force'' a change in that belief, in the sense of definitely proving it false. Yet this does not mean that science can be altogether freed from metaphysical assumptions or beliefs, since scientific thought often also goes well beyond whatever the available data warrant, or operates with assumptions which no one knows yet how to test or prove. One reason for that is that, typically, there are always more theories, than valid data that could corroborate or falsify those theories (Cf. also Stefan Amsterdamski's reflections on this topic). But whereas the metaphysician is likely to say, "this is how it is", the scientist says "We could be wrong".Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel Hegel, a well-known critic of Kant, challenged the modern, materialistic trend of philosophy and attempted to revive metaphysics as a science.Some key terms in Hegel's philosophy include, Spirit, Zeitgeist, Freedom, Dignity and History. In Hegel's controversial philosophy, Metaphysics need not remain at the level of Aristotle's heroic first beginnings, but can be developed into a new science to deal with phenomena that materialist science will not or cannot deal with. Hegel's new science of logic, popularly called, dialectics, combines a synthetic version of science with metaphysical terms to solve contradictions that Kant left unsolved.
Metaphysical subdisciplines - Ontology Philosophy of religion Philosophy of mind Philosophy of perception
Metaphysical topics and problems - Identity and change
Metaphysical jargon - AbstractionAbstraction / Abstract Being Category of being Concrete (philosophy)
People - '':Category:Metaphysics writersMetaphysics writers'' Aristotle Saint Thomas Aquinas, eminent Catholic metaphysician Louis-Victor de Broglie William Kingdon Clifford Donald Davidson (philosopher)Donald Davidson Gilles Deleuze, who attempted to create a poststructuralismpoststructuralist metaphysics. René Descartes, famous for the assertion ''cogito, ergo sum'' ("I think, therefore I am.") Albert Einstein, who inferred from the mathematics of the Theory of relativity that there is no absolute frame of reference (see also logical positivism) Charles Fillmore Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, formulated a complex non-Aristotelian metaphysics based on dialectics Martin Heidegger Werner Heisenberg Immanuel Kant Saul Kripke Gottfried Leibniz David Lewis (philosopher)David Lewis George Edward Moore Charles Peirce Robert M. Pirsig, Author of the popular ''Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance'', which established the theory of reality known as the Metaphysics of Quality Plato Max Planck Karl Popper W. V. Quine Ayn Rand Carl Reichenbach Richard Rorty Bertrand Russell Jean-Paul Sartre, author of seminal existentialist text ''Being and Nothingness'' Erwin Schrödinger, quantum mechanicsquantum mechanic, suggested the famous Schrödinger's cat thought experiment Lao Tzu, author of the Tao Te Ching
See also - Aesthetics Buddhist philosophy Dualism Eastern philosophy Epistemology Ethics Fractal metaphysics List of spirituality-related topics Logical positivism Metaphysics of Quality Monism Mysticism Ontology Philosophy Pluralism (philosophy of mind)Pluralism Reason Taoism Theology Transcendental
References - Lowe, E. J. (2002). ''A survey of metaphysics''. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Loux, M. J. (2002). ''Metaphysics: A contemporary introduction'' (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Kim, J. and Ernest Sosa Ed. (1999). Metaphysics:An Anthology. Blackwell Philosophy Anthologies.Kim, J. and Ernest Sosa, Ed. (2000). A Companion to Metaphysics. Malden Massachusetts, Blackwell, Publishers. Fillmore, Charles (1931, 17th printing July 2000). ''Metaphysical Bible Dictionary''. Unity Village, Missouri: Unity House. ISBN 0-871-59067-0
External links - galilean-library.org - Metaphysics 1 and galilean-library.org - Metaphysics 2, Introductions to Metaphysics by Paul Newall, aimed at beginners. formalontology.it - Ontology. A resource guide for philosophers !etext.library.adelaide.edu.au< /a> - trans. by W. D. Ross perseus.tufts.edu - trans. by Hugh Tredennick (HTML at Perseus) plato.stanford.edu - Aristotle's Metaphysics at Stanford Encyclopedia of PhilosophyStefan Amsterdamski, Between Experience and Metaphysics. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 35. Dordrecht--Boston, Reidel, 1975.arfalpha.com - The Ideal Made Real or Applied Metaphysics For Beginners By Christian D. Larsonlulu.com - How To Master The Universe By Robert Zedros ISBN 1-4116-5230-4Philosophy (navigation) Spirituality Category:Metaphysics Category:Aristotleaf:Met afisikabg:Метафизика bn:অধিবিদ্যা ca:Metafísicacs:Metafyzikada: Metafysikde:Metaphysiket:Metaf üüsikaes:Metafísicaeo:Metaf izikofr:Métaphysiquegl:Metaf sicako:형이상학it:Metafis ica? !(Aristotele)he:מטאפיזי הla:Metaphysicalt:Metafizika nl:Metafysicaja:形而上学no :Metafysikkpt:Metafísicaro:Me tafizicăru:Метафизик аsk:Metafyzikafi:Metafysiikka sv:Metafysiktl:Metapisikatr:Me tafizikzh:形而上学?
|
|
Websites
Namaste Cafe Internet Coffee House
Lightworkers sharing, communicating, learning, growing in Love and Peace. Joining together as One, creating Heaven on Earth!
http://www.namastecafe.com/
Living Successfully Radio
An award winning talk show offering options for success life. Bob Keeton shares unique conversations with leading thinkers in the areas of work, money and relationships.
http://www.livingsuccessfully.com/
Katinka Hesselink Net
Personal website with many articles on karma, reincarnation, buddhism, sufism, fourth way and theosophy. With spiritual quotes by people like Jiddu Krishnamurti, Gurdjieff, Blavatsky and the Dalai Lama.
http://www.katinkahesselink.net/
The Internet Classics Archive
Provides 441 online works of classical literature with a powerful search facility. A booklist links directly to relevant pages in online bookshops. Classical trivia questions can be posted and answered.
http://classics.mit.edu/
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Online philosophy reference work, articles are authored and updated by experts in the field. Edited by Edward Zalta.
http://plato.stanford.edu/
|
|